When is a start?

The sooner the better.

Commander. wrote:

The sooner the better.

I could'nt agree more.

the earlier the better !!

Where is the option for November?

This is a biased poll and should be removed

You're the only one who doesn't want it sooner

Danich Leo_RU wrote:

The reason I wrote this article is because there was a big discussion on the Russian forum about the RU-5 server's start date (this server is parallel to the British one). Some players were upset because of perspective to finish the server at the middle or even at the end of July. Recently, a Community Manager announced that because of many requests to start the server earlier the start day has been shifted from October 29 to October15. I believe the calendar for our favorite UK zone is done too. Thus, we also would like to know when will be the X day.

Go and play in Russia then!

Commander. wrote:

You're the only one who doesn't want it sooner

But my opinion is worth 10,000 other peoples opinions at a minimum surely!

It seems there is only a couple of people shouting about making the server start earlier...

I think the launch date has been set already.
And this topic change nothing...

Therefore waiting for official announcement...
Or may be Moderator say this date there and calm excited players))

163 views, 13 votes.

I can only surmise that the other 150 people want a November start but weren't provided the option so didn't vote

looks like only a couple want a slower start, and that's because they are already on a server. Everyone I know who isn't on a server just now wants an earlier start, and also a good number who are on servers want a new one.

I think while there is good momentum for enthusiastic alliances wanting to join the server, an earlier start should be encouraged. If it gets left too long, they will just start other servers and maybe not join this one. Maybe that's the "slow" people's plan - hope that some of the competition starts elsewhere :p

That is a weak argument and you know it. All the people that dont want is sooner simply want for the server NOT TO BE TEMPERED WITH. Now, that shouldnt me that hard, would it? It would fall nicely with the end of uk1 and start of the new one.

UK29 Was the 2nd fastest server end on the UK servers, many people have been waiting since mid August for a new server.

They couldve joined uk2 if they wanted to play a new server immidietely. But other aiances were busy, as they are now, so I dont see a reason why it should be put forward now, simply because you want it so?

KnowToFail wrote:

That is a weak argument and you know it. All the people that dont want is sooner simply want for the server NOT TO BE TEMPERED WITH. Now, that shouldnt me that hard, would it? It would fall nicely with the end of uk1 and start of the new one.

i presume you are on uk1 and want to start another when it finishes? what about those not on a server who want to start one now? It's not just a few people wanting a start, it's a number of alliances who want to start. From what I can see, it's only a few people from uk1 who don't want it to start

KnowToFail wrote:

They couldve joined uk2 if they wanted to play a new server immidietely. But other aiances were busy, as they are now, so I dont see a reason why it should be put forward now, simply because you want it so?

Seemingly a whole bunch of alliances, UK and international are not busy right now, hence so many people wanting it to start ASAP.

KnowToFail wrote:

They couldve joined uk2 if they wanted to play a new server immidietely. But other aiances were busy, as they are now, so I dont see a reason why it should be put forward now, simply because you want it so?

UK2 Was already running when we ended, we could say the same to you on uk1
why cant you start a new server with a week overlap or something

We was given a challenge and then WE brought it to the forum inviting everyone else.
If we hadn't of got the challenge and then brought it to the forum you wouldn't even be interested.

There are server starts roughly every 48 days. People/alliances can choose to go to whatever server they want to. Surely AA couldve gone to uk2 and be there, dominate and win, since its a relatively dead server. It started after their finished.

But they chose to be willing to join the more hyped/competitive server and for that they have to wait a bit longer. Im not asking for it to be pushed back. All I want is not to ve tempered with, since servers started after that server ended and they chose not play em. Nothing wrong with that, but in order they have to "suffer" the wait time. At least thats how i think it should be.

There’s massive hype around this specific server. There’s are more international alliances and decent domestic alliances preparing- it’s only logical to strike when the enthusiasm is there.

Apart from one or two players over the two threads I’ve seen about this everyone seems ready to go and looking forward to it. It’s not coincidence that they’re on the same server.

All good and well. But we are talking 1-2 weeks here. Not 1-2 months. Surely it wouldnt be pushed forward more then 1-2 weeks.