There are server starts roughly every 48 days. People/alliances can choose to go to whatever server they want to. Surely AA couldve gone to uk2 and be there, dominate and win, since its a relatively dead server. It started after their finished.
But they chose to be willing to join the more hyped/competitive server and for that they have to wait a bit longer. Im not asking for it to be pushed back. All I want is not to ve tempered with, since servers started after that server ended and they chose not play em. Nothing wrong with that, but in order they have to "suffer" the wait time. At least thats how i think it should be.
UK29 Ended August 29th
UK2 started 7th August
I see no difference in you doing what your saying we should of done and start a new server whilst in end game , apart from we would of started a server with no competition at all.
We are the ones who posted a challenge on a number of different domain forums. There is much more than one alliance wanting this to start early yet there are 2 people wanting it to start later.