Furthermore, the outcome of the server was not affected in any way.
I am not saying my values are everyone´s, but they are what I conceive to be right and true, noone can be expected to do better that that.
I am confused, you started as a Kantian and concluded as a consequentialist. Do your values exist for actions or do they depend on the outcome of the actions? If you claim to have morals, shouldn't they be NOT reliant on the consequences but rather purely be "right thing to do"? For example, if you despise backstabbing, you should condemn it regardless of its impact on the server. It seems contradictory to condone it just because "it turned out to be okay this time" or "it wouldn't have changed the outcome in this particular situation anyways".