Finals | 2019 | Statistics

baraka wrote:

as i said earlier, im proud of what my meta achieved we have walled more troops more than all other metas combined

Because there is no one else to attack and your meta do not attack anyone back. I am happy you find pride in the wooden spoon

baraka wrote:

war on 2 fronts from 2 big metas and a small meta, many alliances were send to our sector to disturb our building up..
it was simply a war of attrition against us from all sides !

we managed to wall them all, but i know that our chances are very little for the end game.

ML did a very clever thing by joining Pattanza in the off. operation like they were allies, but only to alert us indirectly where the real attaacks would be.

we walled all the real attacks and lost deff. in the process.

Pattanza didnt know that they were baited from ML to sacrifice their armies at our city walls, and by that they eliminate their danger because they are located in the ML sector

i dont really know much about ML, but for sure they have many WWH and a solid deff. they have not been participating in a fearsome war against anyone for long.

RU-> the ssilence before the Storm

DACIA-> must have a solid def and good off.

as i said earlier, im proud of what my meta achieved we have walled more troops more than all other metas combined

Show All

Stop acting like victim nothing major enough happend for meta that big to be short on deff now your excuses looks just silly

We are very greatful that the ML baited us to splat all troops. Just got an idea, we now have crop for the WW! Awesome, I just wish we were the ones coming up with that idea ourselves!

baraka wrote:

war on 2 fronts from 2 big metas and a small meta, many alliances were send to our sector to disturb our building up..
it was simply a war of attrition against us from all sides !

we managed to wall them all, but i know that our chances are very little for the end game.

ML did a very clever thing by joining Pattanza in the off. operation like they were allies, but only to alert us indirectly where the real attaacks would be.

we walled all the real attacks and lost deff. in the process.

Pattanza didnt know that they were baited from ML to sacrifice their armies at our city walls, and by that they eliminate their danger because they are located in the ML sector

i dont really know much about ML, but for sure they have many WWH and a solid deff. they have not been participating in a fearsome war against anyone for long.

RU-> the ssilence before the Storm

DACIA-> must have a solid def and good off.

as i said earlier, im proud of what my meta achieved we have walled more troops more than all other metas combined

Show All

Don’t worry about Pattanza bro

Ciccio_Shady_IT wrote:

i totally agree, but we accept this situation, is not the first time

i agree, and we enjoy a lot

and we repeat, we like the fact that exodus had to do a pna with russians for fight us, and new italians with ML and china, for fight us

it means they couldn't do otherwise.

Have you already forgotten your attempt to negotiate with ML to come up against us? 🤔

baraka wrote:

war on 2 fronts from 2 big metas and a small meta, many alliances were send to our sector to disturb our building up..
it was simply a war of attrition against us from all sides !

we managed to wall them all, but i know that our chances are very little for the end game.

ML did a very clever thing by joining Pattanza in the off. operation like they were allies, but only to alert us indirectly where the real attaacks would be.

we walled all the real attacks and lost deff. in the process.

Pattanza didnt know that they were baited from ML to sacrifice their armies at our city walls, and by that they eliminate their danger because they are located in the ML sector

i dont really know much about ML, but for sure they have many WWH and a solid deff. they have not been participating in a fearsome war against anyone for long.

RU-> the ssilence before the Storm

DACIA-> must have a solid def and good off.

as i said earlier, im proud of what my meta achieved we have walled more troops more than all other metas combined

Show All

have you already forgotten that someone of your META informed the ML leader about our target in one mission against them? 🤔🤔

baraka wrote:

i dont really know much about ML, but for sure they have many WWH and a solid deff. they have not been participating in a fearsome war against anyone for long.

They have "few" WWKs atleast :D

Carbon wrote:

Yes NE have a lot of mini hammers to hit WWs (Or just one WW ) with but against opponents with large WW def, how much damage will they do? Also large WWKs will also hit their WW hard due to their lack of defence.

According to all fights involving uolas, I'm splitted by two metas that may receive their hammers, maybe with a preference to one

karyon wrote:

I like ur analyses although If I may I want to add/correct some content;

It wasn't Warsong alone that broke up NE border, but Warsong along with DT that did a wonderful job, dunno why everyone keep depreciating DT work.

Another thing is RU, for sure in my opinion they are the favorites to win, and we all know they have a bunch of WWK's but will they have the necessary deff to win? That's what we should look for.

About Uollas meta, after all the events I can only congratulate them for all the Walls they have made, they really surprised me and had lots of success in that, but, "ONLY", in that matter.

I kept reading Finals|Qualy bragging about how good uollas were in offensive OPs but unfortunately I couldn't see that, atleast in this round (is my first though), that was what disapointed me the most because I was looking forward to see what their tacticians could do. Maybe because they had to fight 2 borders they could only manage to play deffensive (my own opinion).

Also a word for some boys on border from Uollas meta, that even though they lost it pretty hard, they still have the spirit to keep playing and helping his team. Respect.

Looking forward to see this Endgame, good luck everyone and that Baronas boy put that juicy WW to 100

Show All

Thanks, appreciate the comment. I don't have the pretention to be omniscient and having full knowledge about the server, so that's why some things can be missing.

I highlighted in your post a sentence where i would like to share my opinion about:

1/ I think noone is/was spitting on whatever DT did, but unlike warsong they suffer from a lack of presence in the forum. As you may have notice, some people here are cocky. Both Uollas and Exodus representants here are. What are you willing to do against a cocky person ? Show his/her mistakes to all. That's why warsong's name was recurring here.

2/ Besides what people claims about multies (ops, tech accounts), they also enjoy watch big armies splat or chief or kill def, in short they like to see reports of big armies to have a comparizon. Without disrespecting what DT did, I'm pretty sure warsong has more abilities than any other DT, more gold, more artifacts, more people checking the account (it seems they are a trial) at every hour of the day, and of course more resources in a way or another.

That's why the audience attention was focused on warsong more than on any DT.

joaozorg wrote:

That is not completely true.

Union since day 30 to day 75 had daily op against chineses and lather germans.

Ops that zeroed 1 or 2 capitals and conquered some villages daily.

You dont see of/def points but that is not because there was no figths. Probably there where more figths in sw then in other quads.

Maybe the targets where bether chouse and ops bether conducted.

Union is probably in the lead but that is because everybody work for the same whit no drama.

Show All

So basically you just give me all the argument i needed to affirm that UNION are the favorite to win this server ?

Way better organization in op, way better people executing the op leading to no crashes.
No crashes, so quicker will be the next operation and bigger UNION's armies will get.

And having all WWK simming peacefully, hard to imagine UNION loosing this server.

Furthermore i didn't said that UNION were intraquad-war free, but i said they were interquad war-free. And that's a big change. With an interquad war, things can drastically change. Accounts with GS+GB queues for more than 50days requires more attention in analyzing incomings than accounts used on daily war purposes. That's were uollas were impressive, whatever we do agree or not with their words, they have a long list of actions speaking for them.

Carbon wrote:

Exactly, fake news. There was never a NAP between NW and SW.

Not sure what any of these guys are talking about.

Imagine how hard is for leaders to control 800 members in your meta. You can't check everyone everytime you need.
The NAP is just between leaders, they agreed together not to do coordinated actions against. But don't worry, there is plenty of post here in the forum that confirms the NAP between Ru-team and Dacia.

About Malysh's fool i don't know the entire story, but as having it always in the outback near UNION border, it 's truly surprising that UNION never launched big hammers with a titans boots effect to chief his hammer. I mean, the guy is alone, surrounded by a fun club, with his teammates def very far and i don't think UNION is struggling to find 3/4 hammers that can overcome 1kk wall. Or is it basically impossible to organize?

NeoRec_IT wrote:

We are very greatful that the ML baited us to splat all troops. Just got an idea, we now have crop for the WW! Awesome, I just wish we were the ones coming up with that idea ourselves!

I am sorry, are you trying to say that NewItalians were somehow tricked by ML to send their hammers in predeterminated locations? The message is very unclear.

NeoRec_IT wrote:

We are very greatful that the ML baited us to splat all troops. Just got an idea, we now have crop for the WW! Awesome, I just wish we were the ones coming up with that idea ourselves!

I think you should check your leading skills, and sometimes is better to stay in silence, thinking about the same old humiliation you received. Do like your friends, who always talked a lot, and it s from day 20 they stay in silence, a silence like the one of today.

We said to pattanza " congratulation the same, off operation well executed, but not well organized ", sometimes you can do the same, or at least, stay in silence.

You did 3 off operations on us, you crashed every hammer in all of the 3, ask some questions, try also to image how we could wall you if we had only a war against you, you crashed when uollas fought 2 border wars + thai in NE, who knows how your crashes would be if we had to fight ONLY against you.

Ciccio_Shady_IT wrote:

I think you should check your leading skills, and sometimes is better to stay in silence, thinking about the same old humiliation you received. Do like your friends, who always talked a lot, and it s from day 20 they stay in silence, a silence like the one of today.

We said to pattanza " congratulation the same, off operation well executed, but not well organized ", sometimes you can do the same, or at least, stay in silence.

You did 3 off operations on us, you crashed every hammer in all of the 3, ask some questions, try also to image how we could wall you if we had only a war against you, you crashed when uollas fought 2 border wars + thai in NE, who knows how your crashes would be if we had to fight ONLY against you.

Why are you playing the sympathy card now?

Earlier today:

"We killed loads of off with a huge def wall"

Later today:

"We do not have enough def for WW"

Why have you gloated about killing so many armies when their impact was always meant to reduce your def, it's like you have just realised that? As its been pointed out to you multiple times, these armies do not have siege for a WWK so their use is to die eventually killing as much def as possible and if they take out a village or two, then all good

Woland_COM wrote:

I am sorry, are you trying to say that NewItalians were somehow tricked by ML to send their hammers in predeterminated locations? The message is very unclear.

I probably should have quoted Barak in my post where he says this "Pattanza didnt know that they were baited from ML to sacrifice their armies at our city walls, and by that they eliminate their danger because they are located in the ML sector" and I was sarcastic.

Ciccio_Shady_IT wrote:

I think you should check your leading skills, and sometimes is better to stay in silence, thinking about the same old humiliation you received. Do like your friends, who always talked a lot, and it s from day 20 they stay in silence, a silence like the one of today.

We said to pattanza " congratulation the same, off operation well executed, but not well organized ", sometimes you can do the same, or at least, stay in silence.

You did 3 off operations on us, you crashed every hammer in all of the 3, ask some questions, try also to image how we could wall you if we had only a war against you, you crashed when uollas fought 2 border wars + thai in NE, who knows how your crashes would be if we had to fight ONLY against you.

Well Im no leader to start with, and wouldnt there be a reason sending a crossquad op with 12+ traveltime on a meta of like 40 alliances where you could have an entire alliance to defend one target each like 2 days before BP release you think?

Carbon wrote:

Why have you gloated about killing so many armies when their impact was always meant to reduce your def, it's like you have just realised that? As its been pointed out to you multiple times, these armies do not have siege for a WWK so their use is to die eventually killing as much def as possible and if they take out a village or two, then all good

There are better strategies to make def dissapear :))

Mostly there will not even be heavy fights taking place, as the def is pulled away or killed in little numbers...

But, who cares... Its Uulooas baby! def that has dissapeared now

Ciccio_Shady_IT wrote:

I think you should check your leading skills, and sometimes is better to stay in silence, thinking about the same old humiliation you received. Do like your friends, who always talked a lot, and it s from day 20 they stay in silence, a silence like the one of today.

We said to pattanza " congratulation the same, off operation well executed, but not well organized ", sometimes you can do the same, or at least, stay in silence.

You did 3 off operations on us, you crashed every hammer in all of the 3, ask some questions, try also to image how we could wall you if we had only a war against you, you crashed when uollas fought 2 border wars + thai in NE, who knows how your crashes would be if we had to fight ONLY against you.

i prefer silence because our italian players didn't deserve this stupid flame, between italians group.

i prefer silence because i think that 1 italian group that scream on international forum is enought

I prefer talk less and do more, will be our action to talk

Like you said you fought 2 border, with 28 alliance and a free quarter (according to me a good war) , meanwhile we fought a quarter with a war on the border ( a good war too), who know what would have happened if we had to fight only against you.

Anyway Compliment for these wall and i would like to say to all the groups good luck for the end game i m sure will be a very thrilling ending

Demix_IT wrote:

i prefer silence because our italian players didn't deserve this stupid flame, between italians group.

i prefer silence because i think that 1 italian group that scream on international forum is enought

I prefer talk less and do more, will be our action to talk

Like you said you fought 2 border, with 28 alliance and a free quarter (according to me a good war) , meanwhile we fought a quarter with a war on the border ( a good war too), who know what would have happened if we had to fight only against you.

Anyway Compliment for these wall and i would like to say to all the groups good luck for the end game i m sure will be a very thrilling ending

Show All

Lol, you don t accept flame?

You are the only who attacked other italians, you came in our border, and now you cry because we joke on you, this is all

28 alliances? Put here the list, and remember you said to me the ones in NW are not with us.

We wait for the list.

Also for you, better stay in silence sometimes, reports and numbers talk for yourself, and for us too, good night

Ciccio_Shady_IT wrote:

Lol, you don t accept flame?

You are the only who attacked other italians, this is all

28 alliances? Put here the list, and remember you said to me the ones in NW are not with us.

Also for you, better stay in silence sometimes, good night

Show All

I accept the flame, we can flame we are good in its we are italian like you

we aren't the only who attacked other italian, you did the same.

You started in 23, now i saw that all the alliance that you had in alliance in -|+ are no more so important to be on the first page maybe they did their work

Like i said i m not here to "flame you" so i will not answer about the only silence that this community would need

Good end game for all and good night

KH2 wrote:

have you already forgotten that someone of your META informed the ML leader about our target in one mission against them? 🤔🤔

i really don´t know that, but do you suggest that you have been manipulated by both sides ?!

CurvaSud12 wrote:

Don’t worry about Pattanza bro

not at all, they have done their best in this server, i respect their effort but i think now they don´t have much left.

NeoRec_IT wrote:

We are very greatful that the ML baited us to splat all troops. Just got an idea, we now have crop for the WW! Awesome, I just wish we were the ones coming up with that idea ourselves!

are you angry after the crash ?! do what emerik does.. just say that we have lost lots of res.

KH2 wrote:

Have you already forgotten your attempt to negotiate with ML to come up against us? 🤔

didn´t you see our brutal war here in the forum
and how many of my posts against them were deleted
i stopped poking them because it got out of controll and my leaders asked me to chill down a pit

bac wrote:

Stop acting like victim nothing major enough happend for meta that big to be short on deff now your excuses looks just silly

i am proud of my meta, i don not display myself as the victim !!
i have just made an analysis to our position till this point..
we are not giving up, we will go all the way to the end
and i as said earlier " its very flattering to have many metas, big and small, attack us then crash at our city walls"

We are too good to fight with others. It's better to fight each other. Sad.

https://travian-tool.com/U2Ko3G09dZ

https://travian-tool.com/jtgkORsSI6

https://travian-tool.com/819yFEPgbt

Carbon wrote:

Why are you playing the sympathy card now?

Earlier today:

"We killed loads of off with a huge def wall"

Later today:

"We do not have enough def for WW"

Why have you gloated about killing so many armies when their impact was always meant to reduce your def, it's like you have just realised that? As its been pointed out to you multiple times, these armies do not have siege for a WWK so their use is to die eventually killing as much def as possible and if they take out a village or two, then all good

Show All

Every message you write proves more and more that you don't understand anything about this game. Maybe that's why it's better to run away and make war with animals. A tip I can give you is to change the game bro, this is not for you