You cant say you have no desire to be a part of it when you answer in the thread. HELLO?!
yeah loffe enjoy the talking etc more than everyone else 
i had something to add, but i won't 
Current News & Server Updates
-
-
Show All
Mads are you even playing com 2 ? or just decided to check in to support some goats propaganda (happy birthday btw)
Duet and ikea numbers are similar to Gow's and less then tens, greater then Goats but in no way are their numbers significantly different on a 1v1 basis.
Tell me mads, if we ignore the wall of zerg type excuses for a moment, do you think it's fair play and just that 5 metas go against one team outnumbering them 4:1 ?
Yes you heard absolutely correctly, 5 metas! not one or two or three teams, NO! we are talking about 5 metas, just to repeat so there is no confusion Mads. With around 800 players and over 100 hammers marching in any single operation, which is 3 times what even the team with the most hammers can send.
Odds at least 4:1 here, cmon be honest does this really seem normal for you, when the average quality of meta players is much higher then ordinary .com domains here..
Now you've spoken about teams that do joint operations as not necessarily confed, and pretty much echoed the zerg choir on this. Normally I'd agree with this stance, however we are not just talking about ordinary op sharing it goes way deeper then that.
We are seeing a huge notable difference then just a confab of 100+ op hammers landing. What's also different here is shared artefacts, shared defense which overlaps and coincides with the joint operations, basically everything which is traditional between confed partners is being played out between the 5 meta mega zerg on a much larger scale.
Thankfully this confab of nearly 1000 players also seems to have it's fair share of disgruntled players even disgruntled leaders, which brings me to my next point, what the mega meta zerg are planning for endgame.
***********
For me this is a cracking server I'd never expected our enemy thought we were so good, they would bring to the furor 5 metas from 4 different quads to tackle just one team, but all may not be what it seems, here is some news what I found out from the massive zerg discussions.
As we know there are 7 metas competing for endgame, Gunners,Ikea/duat, Ten,2.01,Gow,Goats, (Dnd)- playing a side kick & support role also helping to direct the zerglings) unfortunately for the zergs there is not really enough plans to go around for everyone, we've seen already the ultimate mega meta have shared artefacts, even players but how will thing's look moving forward, so let's have a look.
Every meta if they go it alone needs at least 2 sets of ww plans, stay with me here because this is where the mega meta zerg becomes conflicted, since they think that ikea/duet will try to take most if not all of the plans, based on a central strategic position (apparently they heard of them doing it on another server). Before I continue if your part zerg, you may not want to read on. I apologize in advance to anyone in the mass mega meta that thought it was an enemy of my enemy type of deal, or that alliances would go back to working for themselves at some stage, sorry to burst that bubble, you can still believe I'm wrong if you like..
The mega meta leaders also believe they will be extremely lucky to secure even 4-6 ww plans, they don't believe this is realistic option for them. And this is where the leaders of the zerg believe their real problem is, which is also cause for the mega meta zerg to be working so closely in the first place.
Goats/Ten2.0/Gow would still legitimately need 6 sets of plans right ?? if you thought this like I used to then you'd be wrong. Here is where the zerg is heading to put the cherry on the cake.
Your still with me ? it gets really awkward for the mighty mega herd from here... Notice when Dnd are worried about defense they have their members move over to ten or gow or wherever they can to have defense provided for them, and we've seen mega meta artefacts conveniently passed around already, now this is where it gets really ugly
Gow,ten,2.01,Goats, dnd actually have a separate discord channel, where mostly leaders and supposed trusted players are present. What I was reading there indicates that in the very strong likelihood of the mass mega meta missing out on at least the 6 plans they require, they are willing to share plans and even pop members in to a same ally, even if they can just secure 2 or 4, which is evidently a much more likely situation then securing 6.
The zergs have the numbers ofc and this helps them to cause a lot of damage together, but they lack the prime position and real estate to take nearly half the plans needed, even with overwhelming numbers they don't expect it to happen, and are already planning for possible worst case scenarios....
Without giving to much more away, here is at least some food for thought, mark my words and lets see if this is another accurate batman prediction
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.damn Verdie, are you okay? How are you feeling nowadays?
-
You can interpret my writing as you wish. I'm writing here to debunk the excuses that are thrown around for the reason behind this zerg.
LOL bro everyone can see you are writing here for one reason only.
To troll and gaslight.
None of which are working in your favor.
But sure, continue if it makes you feel better.
As for your reply to my post, it isnt worthy of a reply. Too stupid.
-
Show All
LOL bro everyone can see you are writing here for one reason only.
To troll and gaslight.
None of which are working in your favor.
But sure, continue if it makes you feel better.
As for your reply to my post, it isnt worthy of a reply. Too stupid.
"You are doing one thing different than us, you are teching."
"Your own leader pays for techs."
"Stop trolling."
-
"Pays"?
More like Paid, once. And if I start talking about who the money went to, you wont like it.
And yes, you are doing it differently than us. There is literally only 2 players in goats that are teching. The others dont want or cannot afford. I try to encourage all to use and no one does.Whereas you guys, its part of your game play. So yeah.
The shit you keep trying to bring, just check the server once and you will realize not a single one of the techs that my leader paid for are on the server anymore. They are all gone. Deleted.
-
"Pays"?
More like Paid, once. And if I start talking about who the money went to, you wont like it.
And yes, you are doing it differently than us. There is literally only 2 players in goats that are teching. The others dont want or cannot afford. I try to encourage all to use and no one does.Whereas you guys, its part of your game play. So yeah.
The shit you keep trying to bring, just check the server once and you will realize not a single one of the techs that my leader paid for are on the server anymore. They are all gone. Deleted.
You lost this argument the moment you were found paying for techs. "But officer, I only stabbed a few times." Your techs disappeared because Chocolat got eaten up, not because you decided to remove them out of some goodwill lmao.
-
You lost this argument the moment you were found paying for techs.
no one saying we didn't use techs
you are teching better, we are zerging better.
each one and his positive and negative sides, at least zerging cost no money and no time
-
You lost this argument the moment you were found paying for techs. "But officer, I only stabbed a few times." Your techs disappeared because Chocolat got eaten up, not because you decided to remove them out of some goodwill lmao.
And yeah you are better at stabbing than us.. in fact you call yourselves superior at stabbing than us! Nice analogy saravan.
What eaten up? The techs paid for were deleted because we broke our connection with them. The ones that remained werent paid for the benefit of the alliance. They were being used one single person and we all know who he was.
-
And yeah you are better at stabbing than us.. in fact you call yourselves superior at stabbing than us! Nice analogy saravan.
What eaten up? The techs paid for were deleted because we broke our connection with them. The ones that remained werent paid for the benefit of the alliance. They were being used one single person and we all know who he was.
Saying this:
You are doing one thing different than us. Techs.
While:
1. Having techs in your own team
2. Playing for a leader that is ok with buying techs for real money
3. Zerging with other techers
Is just peak irony.
-
Show All
Saying this:
While:
1. Having techs in your own team
2. Playing for a leader that is ok with buying techs for real money
3. Zerging with other techers
Is just peak irony.
lmao
Did you forget what my earlier post said?
I said drop your techs and we will drop the few we have.
What does this sentence say?
It does not accuse you of teching. It says you tech much much harder than us and that is the one thing you do differently.
What is your point saravan?
Why not answer this challenge eh?
You drop all your techs. Delete them. We will not team up with anyone except GoW. We will delete all our techs.
Lets have the fair fight you want.
GoW and GOATS vs Duat and IKEA with zero techs. Lets go.
Accept it if you have the guts to do so. If you dont accept it, you are basically agreeing that you are no good without techs.
Open challenge.
-
Show All
lmao
Did you forget what my earlier post said?
I said drop your techs and we will drop the few we have.
What does this sentence say?
It does not accuse you of teching. It says you tech much much harder than us and that is the one thing you do differently.
What is your point saravan?
Why not answer this challenge eh?
You drop all your techs. Delete them. We will not team up with anyone except GoW. We will delete all our techs.
Lets have the fair fight you want.
GoW and GOATS vs Duat and IKEA with zero techs. Lets go.
Accept it if you have the guts to do so. If you dont accept it, you are basically agreeing that you are no good without techs.
Open challenge.
It's a bit too late for "open challenges" when you already zerged more than half the server.
-
Excuses saravan. Stop giving excuses.
No one zerged against you.
There was one OP against Gunners. We arent even interested in them anymore. They stole one stupid arti we joined in the fun and trashed some capitals.
Your accounts are intact.
Our accounts are intact.
Dont give excuses.
Show us your skill by accepting the challenge.
If you dont, well, as I said, everyone will know you are afraid of fighting us without your techs.
Are you afraid of fighting us without your techs?
-
No one zerged against you.
I see we are being delusional now. We are already fighting without techs, since we don't have any.
-
So you refuse to rise up to the true pure equal footing.
Why wont you fight us on the terms I presented saravan? Why are you so afraid?
-
So you refuse to rise up to the true pure equal footing.
Why wont you fight us on the terms I presented saravan? Why are you so afraid?
Too afraid sorry against the Schrödinger's Zerg which exists and doesn't exist at the same time, depending on what kind of argument you want to make.
-
What zerg against you saravan? Dont just say the 4 meta zerg.
Show me proof. GoW, GOATS and TEN attacked you once. After that, we did nothing on you. After that, IKEA receives fakes and attacks only from us. We havent coordinated anything against you guys after that one time. No one else. What Zerg? Show me proof.
And you didnt answer my question straight. I did say we will only team up with GoW who you say has legitimate reason to be hostile against you. My terms are fair.
Why wont you accept the fair terms saravan? Why wont you agree to fight us on the perfectly fair terms?
-
What zerg against you saravan? Dont just say the 4 meta zerg.
Show me proof. GoW, GOATS and TEN attacked you once. After that, we did nothing on you. After that, IKEA receives fakes and attacks only from us. We havent coordinated anything against you guys after that one time. No one else. What Zerg? Show me proof.
And you didnt answer my question straight. I did say we will only team up with GoW who you say has legitimate reason to be hostile against you. My terms are fair.
Why wont you accept the fair terms saravan? Why wont you agree to fight us on the perfectly fair terms?
The 4 meta zerg.
-
Show me proof of the 4 meta zerg against you saravan.
Without proof no one will believe you.
And you still evade my question.
Why wont you accept my fair terms? There is no zerg in the terms there are no techs in the terms. Just your meta and mine. Whats so difficult in it for you to evade the topic so much saravan?
-
Show me proof of the 4 meta zerg against you saravan.
Without proof no one will believe you.
And you still evade my question.
Why wont you accept my fair terms? There is no zerg in the terms there are no techs in the terms. Just your meta and mine. Whats so difficult in it for you to evade the topic so much saravan?
Well if you wanna do without techs we would have to even out the numbers as well. IKEA+Duat without techs would be less accounts than Goats or gow alone, by far. So top 50% of Goats vs. ikea+duat? I don't think Goats would be too easy of a target in that case tbh, maybe most would still be farms but atleast some would be able to fight back. That would give us some practice for our catas before GoW shows up for the real challenge
-
Show me proof of the 4 meta zerg against you saravan.
Without proof no one will believe you.
And you still evade my question.
Why wont you accept my fair terms? There is no zerg in the terms there are no techs in the terms. Just your meta and mine. Whats so difficult in it for you to evade the topic so much saravan?
Proof:
