No quality. Only techs.

Rextugenos_FI wrote:

Tech account is an account played for another accounts benefit, built to be raided by 1 single account or 1 single alliance.

Different from multi how ? It has a player and not played via proxy.

To clarify the point here, I believe there used to be a rule which stated each account had to be played to its own benefit. Is that correct? Was that rule dropped, allowing multiple people to essentially use multiple accounts to the sole benefit of one?

Previously a multihunter would have punished such accounts, but I assume they found it too much work so just allowed this practice to happen, and the term 'tech account' was invented?

Great Slayer wrote:

Ignorant is you believing that people actually use techs as they were meant to be. Instead 95% of them are just proxy multies people use and slap a "TECH" sticker on them to make it look authentic.

And 76% of percentages are pulled out of nowhere.

The private farm type of tech, or one that sends all the res to a single player has pretty much been dealt with with recent and soon to come changes.
However, accounts have always been used to help someone get to village two faster or to garage troops. This is being looked at, but for now those will remain as "tech" accounts.

Great Slayer wrote:

It is supposed to be different, but it's kind of the same.

So no, it is not different in reality.

Wait a second....you mean Duat is cheating? No way....no no.They are pure skilled players 100%

Now get ready to get flamed by tons of swedes (tonzofswedes,you got the joke ??:D)

Excel wrote:

The private farm type of tech, or one that sends all the res to a single player has pretty much been dealt with with recent and soon to come changes.
However, accounts have always been used to help someone get to village two faster or to garage troops. This is being looked at, but for now those will remain as "tech" accounts.

that is such a joke... im waiting to see what they came up with

Excel wrote:

The private farm type of tech, or one that sends all the res to a single player has pretty much been dealt with with recent and soon to come changes.
However, accounts have always been used to help someone get to village two faster or to garage troops. This is being looked at, but for now those will remain as "tech" accounts.

I think it will still be a long time until they can deal with techs efficiently. It will be really tough to be able to fairly detect and get rid of accounts that only feeds diet villas/garages troops/boosts at the start and so on without massive effort of the devs. So many different ways to tech that I can not see how they would be able to implement rules that covers it all without potentially screwing over a lot of regular accounts as well at this point

Venom_RO wrote:

Wait a second....you mean Duat is cheating? No way....no no.They are pure skilled players 100%

Now get ready to get flamed by tons of swedes (tonzofswedes,you got the joke ??:D)

that is such a joke... im waiting to see what they came up with

wait, you mean Thoth is lying in his profile ? who would have thought

[CWL]ivaR wrote:

wait, you mean Thoth is lying in his profile ? who would have thought

no no...ofc not.

I think that guy is just a hater

Xlore wrote:

I think it will still be a long time until they can deal with techs efficiently. It will be really tough to be able to fairly detect and get rid of accounts that only feeds diet villas/garages troops/boosts at the start and so on without massive effort of the devs. So many different ways to tech that I can not see how they would be able to implement rules that covers it all without potentially screwing over a lot of regular accounts as well at this point

Especially considering that the community has largely "devolved" to hunting for every possible exploit. I.e. as soon as the private farm announcement was made, I had someone contacting me to find out how they could continue private farming without risking bans. Some communities still strongly dislike techs and police themselves (.fr and .de), but that is certainly no longer the case for .com.

wishmaster3 wrote:

Especially considering that the community has largely "devolved" to hunting for every possible exploit. I.e. as soon as the private farm announcement was made, I had someone contacting me to find out how they could continue private farming without risking bans. Some communities still strongly dislike techs and police themselves (.fr and .de), but that is certainly no longer the case for .com.

Yes. I would definitely prefer playing a game where no one had any techs at all, but as long as it is a part of the game I won't be the one to stay away from it and be at a disadvantage due to some kind of unwritten rules. If they don't clamp down hard on teching there will always be large amount of players that just instantly find a way around the changes (as with this new patch)

If Using techs is well within the game rules, then it’s also fair to say it’s a clean tactic for alliances to use.

Disappointing then that some teams Will still go way beyond this point, look at gow for instance, leadership banned, resources under the radar, recruiting known cheats...

Let’s have rules in place that are tough enough to eliminate cheats, from the very first offence!

Bat Man wrote:

If Using techs is well within the game rules, then it’s also fair to say it’s a clean tactic for alliances to use.

Disappointing then that some teams Will still go way beyond this point, look at gow for instance, leadership banned, resources under the radar, recruiting known cheats...

Let’s have rules in place that are tough enough to eliminate cheats, from the very first offence!

Mate comon, Avis is gonna roast you again...

I mean bro, if even your own leadership doesn't approve of your posts....

1qaz wrote:

what would you have done without us ?

imo best way to tackle the cheats, is to pull by the roots, weed the problems from our game for good, not just from gow, any team where cheating has become an issue.

Rextugenos_FI wrote:

Another ignorant comment here...

Josec Tech account is an account played for another accounts benefit, built to be raided by 1 single account or 1 single alliance.

Different from multi how ? It has a player and not played via proxy. GL to ur gaming !

What do you mean "it has a player"? Multies have players also.

How should they be used? And what's wrong with one person running them? I actually think it shows dedication.

Bat Man wrote:

imo best way to tackle the cheats, is to pull by the roots, weed the problems from our game for good, not just from gow, any team where cheating has become an issue.

except that you always only talk about GoW while Ikea and Gunners had accounts who bought resources.

Luckily, your own leader knows that you are an annoying imbecile so it doesn’t matter what you say.

Techs have never been a major trend on .com, we have never seen the use of techs as we saw this round. It happens once in a few servers but .com servers have usually frowned upon this.

Its not because we can't do it, but we don't want to. However when there is such massive use of techs on a server the only choice is to get left behind or do the same. Thus one team can drag everyone into this race, given that its legal now we cant really say much.