Best 2020 performances!

📝 Update to the General Terms & Conditions 📝

We've recently revised our General Terms & Conditions to the current legal and statutory situation as well as the range of services currently offered by Travian Games. More information can be found here. ➡️ LINK
  • Laurel_Wreath_Travian_3_tribes.png




    ALLIANCES


    ServerStart_Illustration.jpg


    01_150__0008_Phil.pngBest population performances01_150__0008_Phil.png


    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png
    Alliance Members Ø Points Days Server
    Roman_Numerals_1.png BAR-ICU 60 18.356 1.101.388 247 Anglo 1, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_2.png Trifecta 58 17.107 992.196 233 Anglo 2, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_3.png GoT 57 16.031 913.740 247 Anglo 1, Round 2 (T4.5)



    01_150__0000_AttackerRanking.pngBest offensive performances 01_150__0000_AttackerRanking.png

    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Alliance Members Points Days Server
    Roman_Numerals_1.png Pokédex 57 17.412.902 237 Anglo 6, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_2.png J4H 59 16,060,291 230 Anglo 2, Round 1 (T4.4)
    Roman_Numerals_3.png GoT 57 11.936.190 247 Anglo 1, Round 2 (T4.5)



    01_150__0004_DefenderRanking.png Best defensive perfomances 01_150__0004_DefenderRanking.png

    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Alliance Members Points Days Server
    Roman_Numerals_1.png Pokédex 57 23.425.676 237 Anglo 6, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_2.png LT 54 21.792.013 267 Anglo 3, Round 1 (T4.4)
    Roman_Numerals_3.png GoT 57 15.846.442 247 Anglo 1, Round 2 (T4.5)




    PLAYERS

    ServerStart_Illustration_Waiting.jpg


    01_150__0008_Phil.png Best population performances 01_150__0008_Phil.png

    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Account Alliance Points Villages Days Server
    Roman_Numerals_1.png Wesley Willis BAR-ICU 44.796 44 247 Anglo 1, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_2.png Noiserr CutAbove 43.920 43 226 Anglo 5, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_3.png P1x1e Trifecta 42.169 45 233 Anglo 2, Round 2 (T4.5)



    01_150__0000_AttackerRanking.pngBest offensive performances01_150__0000_AttackerRanking.png


    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Account Alliance Points Days Server
    Roman_Numerals_1.png Bugsbunny LT 3.656.591 267 Anglo 3, Round 1 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_2.png Typhlosion Pokédex 3.442.286 237 Anglo 6, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_3.png Eevee Pokédex 2.125.858 237 Anglo 6, Round 2 (T4.5)



    01_150__0004_DefenderRanking.png Best defensive performances 01_150__0004_DefenderRanking.png

    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Account Alliance Points Days Server
    Roman_Numerals_1.png Jigglypuff
    Pokédex 2.792.830 237 Anglo 6, Round 2 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_2.png Kadabra Pokédex 2.510.559 267 Anglo 3, Round 1 (T4.5)
    Roman_Numerals_3.png Ralsei
    LT 2.213.801 267 Anglo 3, Round 1 (T4.5)



    01_150__0013_VictoryPointsRanking.pngBest hammers (Consumption)   01_150__0013_VictoryPointsRanking.png


    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Account Alliance Tribe Wheat Consumption Server Round
    Roman_Numerals_1.png kung fu panda J4H Teuton_Icon_T4.png Teuton 1.119.446 Ts2 Round 1
    Roman_Numerals_2.png Walker J4H Teuton_Icon_T4.png Teuton 1.045.427 Ts2 Round 1
    Roman_Numerals_3.png Charmander Pokédex Roman_Icon_T4.png Roman 926.234 Ts6 Round 2


    01_150__0013_VictoryPointsRanking.pngBest hammers (Attack Strenght)   01_150__0013_VictoryPointsRanking.png


    Attacker_Defender_65x62.png Account Alliance Tribe Attack Strenght Server Round
    Roman_Numerals_1.png kung fu panda J4H Teuton_Icon_T4.png Teuton 44.967.535 Ts2 Round 1
    Roman_Numerals_2.png Charmander Pokédex Roman_Icon_T4.png Roman 42.536.735 Ts6 Round 2
    Roman_Numerals_3.png Walker J4H Teuton_Icon_T4.png Teuton 42.414.500 Ts2 Round 1
  • I don't think Anglo3Round1 should be listed as T4.5 because it started as T4.4 and only got an upgrade when the server was over half of its lifespan.

    "Over iets nadenken zonder het per definitie waar hoeft te zijn is een vorm van ontwikkeling."

  • I don't think Anglo3Round1 should be listed as T4.5 because it started as T4.4 and only got an upgrade when the server was over half of its lifespan.

    I'm taking the info from when the server finished. I don't think it's a big issue for this, is it?