What's purpose of such a good braindump, which basically happens each year, when TG prioritize own agenda and don't discuss, do math or evaluate with entire community impact of changes?
just look at new interface or implementations.
They launched first, then they came with audience sentiment / promoter score / feedback on launches on live.
Normally, you test extensively in dev and later, after control groups give their entire feedback, you go to production.
Not quite that yet.
Question, have all the proposals of earlier years been discussed or evaluated?
We had comprehensive applications last years, ideas as well.
I must say, I am highly disappointed that no clear clarifications came publicly from .com representative.
That was one of key promises and KPIs - what is point of assuming a target that does not get achieved?
How does one get remotivated to apply and try bringing an improvement if 20-30% max of previous year is taken action (at most) on?
C.
He controls EVERYTHING. When actually he doesn't do anything, but everyone thinks he does, so that's good enough to scare People. And his anonymous and secret title, always hiding his identity, helps again.
Groot is not evil.
