Posts by -Hyperion-

Hit once farm forever :kek: we have plenty of folks who have lost their caps 4-5x and are still here. At least those people do more then send a full hammer on a feeder and don’t act surprised why it didn’t splat.

[ cwl ] Brezzok wrote:

sorry I hear some irelivent team doing some squeaking ..

I don't pay attention to Tech SH!t on footpath

Flat packs and allies mmm multi tech's is twice my number.

I'm half of Gunners size so I see no comparison.

And we rebuild faster than dog poo sticks to our feet

Not like gunners once a hit always a farm

Self reminder... Don't step on dog poo.

TG will love the gold on this server as all others bar s1 are dead.

Yet after this unless rules change TG is dead as very few ppl I know will play again soon.

Show All

russell_hantz wrote:

You mean that at that point you were doing well diplomatically so you decided to gloat about it to those who were doing poorly diplomatically and now that you are the one doing poorly diplomatically, diplomacy doesnt matter?

I do not think any of us are complaining about our diplomatic state. Our actions is what got us here and we recognize that and our diplomacy is the end of our swords and the front face of our Phalanx. If it takes 5 metas to handle our style of diplomacy, well this round just got 5x more interesting. I look forward to this challenge. Do you?

I came here today looking for banter from the two ops that landed very recently. Back reading this I see a lot about how Gunners is outnumbered and in a never ending war. How we will quit if we dont start making bridges (aka zerging). If Gunners losses this 5v1 war then so be it. If we lose every cap, feeder, and village then so be it. I will not quit, give in out of fear and spite. We will fight till we have nothing left to fight with, and when this happens we will fight that much harder. So do as you say, zero us 30 or 40 targets at a time. We are not farms or noobs who quit when we lose our caps or hammers. Our resolve and commitment as a team from what I can tell has never been stronger. I do not speak for gunners in what I say, just a simple follower and believer in Gunners.

On a side note I find it amusing how cocky the zergers are on the forums. Dont let it go to your head, you may have numbers, you may have a few skilled players, however I believe you have instilled a resolve in your enemies to see you fall faster then you rose. How this post will age, will be a true testament of how the server has gone.

I also just realized something, the full IGM was never shown, therefore you only saw that one part.

sakku wrote:

Is this Hyperion the same guy who settled a cata point in our quad and when a player asked why are you doing this given we are not enemies, he replied "I am here to stay, let us see what you can do about it". Now we did something, did we not ?

You mean where someone demanded I leave the quadrant when I just settled a cat point and I responded to a 6 village noob saying "make me". Then yes, that would be who I am. And while were on the subject my dual took the time to add up every fake wasted on our cat points, including a few chiefs with no escort and my favorite. The over 2000 tts sent at us 10 at at time. For what you spent in fakes you could of built 3 level 19 fields.

[CWL/GOAT] SmirkingJay wrote:

Umm 3 quad.

GOATs is not part of this one thank you very much.

My apologies, I will make an edit to my original statement.

Heverton wrote:

Still crying about how unfair life is that 200 accounts can't fight fairly against 100 accounts I see?

Get a grip lads. You have a lot of players that are quality. Lead them to victory and stop showering them w waterfalls of tears.

.

DDP wrote:

Perhaps you should talk to your leader who asked you to put arte cata point villages in our quad. You know you are waging war on SE meta when you put mulitple cata points there.(yes IKEA put villages therre as well and will be dealt with later ) we have heard from some of your players how dissappointed they are with verdie and co's decision making abilities. so why are you crying now when we took the chance to def your hammers. This is not even about zerging XD.

You mistake me. I feel quite honored that you fear gunners and co so much. If its a fight you want its a fight you will get. If we manage to prevail against you being so out numbered in the end then the victory will be that much sweater. However if we fail I yield to you.

Gunners (206 accounts) vs 4 quad meta (494 accounts) I do not know where 2.01 lies in this conflict so I did not add them into this count while I do believe them to be in cahoots with ten.

Thats 1:2.3 So you need 2.3 of your accounts to fight 1 of ours. I think I speak for many in gunners when I say we take pride in your fear of us. (Correct me if im wrong fellow gunners as I do not wish to put words in your mouth)

Joker clapping Batman wrote:

I admit you have been given way too much attention, maybe you should get out of the forums and realise that the single op from dnd and gow crippled gunners from getting any decent arty

We can even say if it was not for the gow missplay on UF the mighty warriors would have been mighty deleters, get off your high horse batty boy and come down to reality, your so called warriors are bad players, getting crippled after a single op is embarassing

I strongly recommend you get a dictionary, go look up the word crippled. There were 11 reals on gunners and we walled 3. So 8 got through. That represents a fraction of the capitals of this alliance.

Since when is gunners bad players ? We’ve consistently lead the charge in terms of average skill level Imo. Are you even on the server?

Sure gunners didn’t get the artefacts we may have wanted. However that happens, we will steal them , we will find a way to get them and if we don’t then we will make do with out.

Just this week we landed another op, it took 4 teams to wall less then half of our hammers.

You speak of great strengths and leads over us but cower behind your mass numbers and zerging. Perhaps you should quit and return when you have what it takes to go toe-to-toe with us. There is no honour in fighting us 4v1.

Thank you for getting back to me. I am glad that you guys are working on it . I totally understand this is a very hard subject or system to implement.

Good Morning,

Over the last 3 years I have played travian, learned it, found a "online family" here, however, I also have a real family which also plays travian since 2007. In this time we have been banned and punished frequently for trying to enjoy this game together. I fully understand Multi-Hunters are trying to stop multi-accounts and cheaters which I fully support !!! I truly dislike cheaters and I have never allowed someone breaking a rule to remain on my team. With the new rule enforcement team it has become impossible to play the same server as my family members. Previously, multi hunters would listen, it would be hard work to prove your not breaking the rules but it was possible. Now, they are unmoving and unwilling to listen. They are incapable of seeing past the results of their tools. I fully respect multi-hunters for what you do, I know its hard and I do not want to fault you. That being said, I believe their should be some way to identify travian families or couples who play on separate accounts. There are many couples, families, brothers or sister pairs who play this game. I even know some who got married because they met on this game. A system is needed. Perhaps create an ID system or a list associated with their emails which require extensive screening to make sure these are not people multing. Make it difficult for these people to be approved, include a way that requires them to distinguish themselves as different people while showing their travian knowledge. I am tired of being banned and watching the real people who are abusing tech accounts for self gain go unscathed, it is frustrating and makes me question what was gained with the rule enforcement team change. If there is somewhere better for me to post these please let me know, however I feel attention must be drawn to this issue.

With my utmost respect

Someone want to do a server break down ? fine with quick and dirty, im a bit out of touch with things this round and not following forums / discord, if one was recently done please point me towards it !

Thanks !!!

[ cwl ] Brezzok wrote:

GOATS didn't take more better cropper in boonies as we don't run away, prefore closer to enemy's over bigger simming

Not spam, explaining your point.

On croppers

But thanks it's great to have real threads

Show All

The world is round, so in the further you go the closer you actually are.

Ajax. wrote:

you are forgetting all the Gunners wings

It's everyone else who is outnumbered

That wouldn’t be fear I smell is it Ajax ?

Good Morning Forums!

Fresh from the presses is your long awaited cropper review of the server.

Before I get started I want to thank a few people who without their assistance this would not have turned out so well MisterB_IL and everyone else in Gunners your the best spreadsheet warriors !!! So thank you.

This cropper review will be broken down Quad by Quad and then ally by ally within said quad. It also needs to be said that we did not take into effect conflicting oasis.

Originally I was going to provide commentary but after seeing these numbers I think they speak for themselves.

NE:

NW:

SW:

SE:

Total Settled Croppers by quad

https://prnt.sc/uazu6e

15c 150%/125% : How many each team settled

https://prnt.sc/uazpeb

Most 15c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazsbl

Most 9c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazso2

Most 125 15c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazsuw

Most 150 15c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazt6i

9c > 100%

https://prnt.sc/uaztn5

Average Distance from 0,0

https://prnt.sc/uazutz

Average Distance from 0.0 with only 15c 125%/150%

https://prnt.sc/uazvpz

Alliances with most Gz Caps

https://prnt.sc/uazw2o

Teams with 4 villages

https://prnt.sc/uazys7

Average Village Counts

https://prnt.sc/uazzpr

I had planned to write a long and lengthy review about who I think is in the lead but I decided against it. I am going to write a few things here that I noticed while sifting through the data. IKEA has a damn strong core around the GZ, very interesting to see once they start running ops with their shorter walk times to other quads. Most of GOW was forced further into their quad by duat but by doing so they have better overall croppers. Ten and Goats both secured the most croppers in their quad but not by a large margin nor did the secure a lot of high % croppers.

Good Morning Forums!

Fresh from the presses is your long awaited cropper review of the server. (This will also be posted in the Stat thread so it doesnt get buried here).

Before I get started I want to thank a few people who without their assistance this would not have turned out so well MisterB_IL and everyone else in Gunners your the best spreadsheet warriors !!! So thank you.

This cropper review will be broken down Quad by Quad and then ally by ally within said quad. It also needs to be said that we did not take into effect conflicting oasis. This data was gathered 2/9/2020

Originally I was going to provide commentary but after seeing these numbers I think they speak for themselves.

NE:

NW:

SW:

SE:

Total Settled Croppers by quad

https://prnt.sc/uazu6e

15c 150%/125% : How many each team settled

https://prnt.sc/uazpeb

Most 15c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazsbl

Most 9c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazso2

Most 125 15c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazsuw

Most 150 15c settled

https://prnt.sc/uazt6i

9c > 100%

https://prnt.sc/uaztn5

Average Distance from 0,0

https://prnt.sc/uazutz

Average Distance from 0.0 with only 15c 125%/150%

https://prnt.sc/uazvpz

Alliances with most Gz Caps

https://prnt.sc/uazw2o

Teams with 4 villages

https://prnt.sc/uazys7

Average Village Counts

https://prnt.sc/uazzpr

I had planned to write a long and lengthy review about who I think is in the lead but I decided against it. I am going to write a few things here that I noticed while sifting through the data. IKEA has a damn strong core around the GZ, very interesting to see once they start running ops with their shorter walk times to other quads. Most of GOW was forced further into their quad by duat but by doing so they have better overall croppers. Ten and Goats both secured the most croppers in their quad but not by a large margin nor did the secure a lot of high % croppers.

-SR wrote:

Here's hoping that any predictions you make are more accurate here than they were on AS6

Good thing im not making any predictions, just reviewing and providing commentary after looking at facts and stats.

MisterB_IL wrote:

what a coincidence? u also part of the new players line of gunners?

yeah were the new recruits from anglo

I am not here to start arguments or provide false hoods. This is my first round with gunners and my first .com round since 2017 so I will be providing a fully factual review. If facts and stats is propaganda then this conversation ended before it begun.

Almost done guys, about half way through someone was like "your doing this the hard way". Now with some amazing help from Gunners Spreadsheet warriors (an area i was never good at it) we are finishing it up. Tomorrow Morning (American morning) I will post a view only link to a google sheet along with my review of how it looks. Sorry for the long wait guys !

Dominic_AU wrote:

i guess the guy who was supposed to do analysis gave up after reading 14 pages of gunners vs gow history

sakku wrote:

Would love a cropper analysis bro, that will distract everyone then.

svenie wrote:

Including wings you still have half the server.

yeah but rn Im going through about 1140 accounts so trying to sane as best as i can. lol

Willb1 wrote:

wouldn't using the crop finder be faster?

well if i was only looking at croppers yes, I am reviewing Village averages / oasis and type of caps.