i don't mind you add it to the list. Didn't know about this one. DND lost the only WWK they had ? ? ?
One member of Duat is saying 35 caps, then you say 50 caps. first compare the numbers with your friends, then come to here with them.
That's you say you are right doesn't mean you are. Saying whole numbers like 50, 35 etc just show you are bluffing and not serious.
Unlike me which i said 7 caps last op, this is a real number, i didn't say 5, 10, 15, 20. Stop the bluff!!
I like to see you understood I'm right like you said we both lost same amount +-. Now, we can agree or disagree if losing this amount of catas in one account or the lose divide to 5 accounts its the same.
Go back to school and learn some basic reading comprehension before you immediately hit that reply button.
35 capitals properly destroyed - to be a bit more merciful to you, I ignored the capitals that were hit in the sneaky sweep ops and did get damaged but not as significantly.
I don't agree at all with your 1+1=3 math of counting catas, I was talking about the difference between holding catas for 1 player and several players and just used a figure as an example. My mistake however, I assumed I was talking with someone with more than two braincells.
I don't even know what your point is to come here and write fiction it's not going to change the reality of your situation in game anyways.
1)Saying you should not start a game if you will retire in the middle, its fine, i can agree to that.
But its doesn't change the fact you attacked and did well when most of the serve less active, and with less ambition. Doing same ops on day 90-100 would be completely different. You know it, and that's the reason you didn't do them. Otherwise what did stop you ?
2)About the numbers of capitals demolish, you catch me on small mistakes etc. everyone can do that and catch you on something small.
To my opinion our op was more successful, you can agree or disagree, but saying "you did not count right" its petty.
3)about the catas number the zerg number 2 lost, well, if you insinst on going into the numbers - so be it.
Cosmo: 24 waves of 300 cata each = 7200
you did try another 3 chiefs. each one 800 catas = 2400
Gunners catgut with 5k catas at home (WWK) = 5000
+ all GUNNERS catas splat, I will be generous with you and will say = 4000
Together it 18400.
Its the same amount of the catas number we lost, even slightly more.
Op 60 days ago from 3 alliances attacking together resulting in 20-ish caps being hit of which the majority were techs is definietly more successful than losing 2 WWKs, 3 hammer vills and ~50 GoW caps you delusional clown.
And then you go on to compare cata numbers where you conveniently include anything Gunners lost and apply it to us but simultanouesly leave out anything your zerg allies lose. You either compare both or you don't at all, but of course then it would be obvious you can't do basic math. But that's not even the thing of importance here, there is a huge difference between 1 player losing 11k catas and 5 players losing 11k catas combined. I'm not even going to bother explaining why because you are too low skilled to understand the difference anyways.
You know that everyone is attacking Gunners because your diplocamcy sucks and made everyone hate you right? There is no zerg we are just attacking you for our own individual reasons. And you are right I'm really stupid and I guess you are also a much better player than I will ever be since you were skilled enough to be invited to Gunners. In fact me pointing out that your OP-hammers are not that great (overall) considering your many techs is just me being jealous.
Yeah no zerg, just accidentally timed attacks from 4 alliances on every op since artis were released. Players just accidentally jumping into other alliances everytime one of the 4 metas gets attacked. Artis just accidentally being transferred with no resistance between 4 alliances. Motivations may be individual, playstyle is definietly not. I understand you may be embarrassed over the whole ordeal, especially if you are still struggling with these increadiable advantages. Now please reply to this and cry zerg because we defended Gunners once, it's not close to the size, server duration and the level of cooperation of what you guys are doing.
You accuse us for being a zerg and still not doing well. Well look at you, you are a zerg, defending together, and timing ops together, and yet you caused way less damage than our single op. In the first op on Nordics we took more caps than Nordics took in 4 ops. Not talking about your friends in GUNNERS
Don't forget we also lost 6 million catas.
I would like to ask you to elaborate these accusations but that would be against the forum rules.
I don't know what makes you think there are any bots and scripts in use. If it's the timed attacks during operations, I'll laugh you off. Sending timed waves is now easier than ever with the in-game wavebuilder. You only need some extra time in your hands.
Techs we have never pretended we don't have and crying over them at this point is like beating a dead horse. You have them yourselves as well, do you bawl your eyes out in your ally chats too?
Alarms? Do you always wake up at the right time without anyone or anything telling you to wake up? I doubt.
You left the server Discord only to come here to continue your Don Quijote'ish rambling, which probably has no support even in your own bubble. Or, maybe it does, after having a look on the list of occupied WW's. Unfortunately it doesn't make it any less laughable.
Current list of excuses as to why an alliance that has had help with def, off and artis from 3 other metas for over 60 days are somehow still struggling:
- Enemy uses bots
- Enemy uses scripts
- Enemy uses techs
- Enemy uses alarms (?)
- Enemy simmed until whichever server day we started realizing we are losing the war
- Low activity after whichever server day we started realizing we are losing the war
- "We are only here for Gunners" a.k.a. the third wheel
- "We are not really playing seriously"
- Enemy has a lot of luck
- Enemy lost 6 million catas
- Enemy got massively destroyed in that ops 60 days ago where 3 metas decided to attack together and go reals on caps of which some were 6c, 7c and 9c:s.
I tried to "broke the ice" cause its seems to be so cold and salty in here, even for the penguin in your profile.
Also, i found a bug in Travian that people can change the quote Achtung and Travian support team to your attention,
glad i helped. in return a gift of 10k gold to Prince Zuko account might be nice
More like you tried desperately to lie about what I said. Kind of like how desperate you are to seek help from 4 other metas because you aren't good enough to win on your own.
Bonus points for trying to sprinkle some propaganda too in that falsified quote before you edited it out like a coward by saying 3 instead of 4 metas.
finally i agree with you sarvaran
You really must be desperate for my attention when you change my quote (cute edit by the way too hide it). You seem bad at counting too, I count 4, 5 if 2.01 is to be treated as a separate meta.
Ajax "u mad bro?" was a meme from the previous decade really gotta up your game.
Imagine lacking any arguments so you go for the classic YoU sEeM aNgRy BrO.
Imagine coming to a server forums in which you don't even play in. On a scale of 1 to 10, how sad must your life be?
Show me proof of the 4 meta zerg against you saravan.
Without proof no one will believe you.
And you still evade my question.
Why wont you accept my fair terms? There is no zerg in the terms there are no techs in the terms. Just your meta and mine. Whats so difficult in it for you to evade the topic so much saravan?
What zerg against you saravan? Dont just say the 4 meta zerg.
Show me proof. GoW, GOATS and TEN attacked you once. After that, we did nothing on you. After that, IKEA receives fakes and attacks only from us. We havent coordinated anything against you guys after that one time. No one else. What Zerg? Show me proof.
And you didnt answer my question straight. I did say we will only team up with GoW who you say has legitimate reason to be hostile against you. My terms are fair.
Why wont you accept the fair terms saravan? Why wont you agree to fight us on the perfectly fair terms?
The 4 meta zerg.
So you refuse to rise up to the true pure equal footing.
Why wont you fight us on the terms I presented saravan? Why are you so afraid?
Too afraid sorry against the Schrödinger's Zerg which exists and doesn't exist at the same time, depending on what kind of argument you want to make.