Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 23.

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Thanks, ELE. These were the words I couldn't find.

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    go back to 3.6, blaze. in the good old days we had to send every single farm attack by reports

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    lemon had told you that he had missed a part and therefore could not answer some of your questions. The "we" I used could have indicated I had been participating, couldn't it? Really crunchie: revise your way to speak with others. Might be they are more willing to reply if you manage.

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Neither talking "instead" nor "over the UK 'represenative'". I was on the obviously wrong assumption this is a public forum and everyone was welcome to participate in a thread. But well, you seem to know better than I do as well about who is allowed to speak here as about how "TG picked the people".

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Doesn't make any sense to reply to you, right? I was trying to be polite and add some answers to your questions. And all you give in reply is ... well. I leave the uk-forum to you, folks. Doesn't seem additional input is wanted here if it not exactly matches the wishes of some really demanding users. I play on .de and .com and have been asked to go to Munich by the German CM, crunchie. As I have stated I have never felt like being a "representative".

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Might be the picture lemon posted led to a false impression. Just I dont know where the first one is... The board was all covered in paper. We later removed topics that didn't seem of great importance. This is when lemon's pic was taken. And the circle, crunchie was no sign of importance. We had clustered the remaining topics and re-arranged them on the board for a better overview. The discussion itself was not (as you seem to assume) like Q: Can you do that? A: yes/no It was more discussing the…

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Quote from notorious crunchie: “So there was discussion about whether or not their would be one in the future of the possibility of doing one? 3 stickers is worth the discussion time of "we tried once, wasn't that popular". I don't recall it happening so perhaps their problem is they ran the server in secret and didn't tell anyone... Quote from Lemon: “Not sure we actually got an answer on that one, but then again I missed a bit of the game design workshop.. ” Just before I completely lose my , …

  • Same here, Buz. Our team (around 50 players) was ready and has been waiting for restart for like 4 weeks now. A server starting in May will go through the summer, so we couldn't play it. Missed other starts cause waiting for ukx, so now... we'll probably have to wait till autumn for another start. Would have been enough to announce it in time. Or to.... i dare say.... _ask_ the players, uh?

  • -.- everyone sitting and waiting for ukx announcement and now... this. nice job again, TG .... not.

  • The idea of having sections for each server is nice. Just the realization is insufficient, sadly. Why throw all "S1"-servers from different domains into the same section? This means that I (who reads more than one domain) can either have _all_ S1-servers or _none_. Seeing all doesn't help to make the forum -structure less confusing. Having none is... well, you get my point?

  • UK Goes To Munich!

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    wow again. maybe TG should consider training their staff rather than to invite lemon to anywhere.

  • Quote from Schmitz' Katze: “I didn't like it (chuckle) But for the same reasons as ELE I like the idea of limiting support (troops or res) to ally members and maybe confeds. Moreover, that would ruin the res- and troop-sellers immediately and decrease the numbers of their bot-accounts. Worth a try imo. ” Additionally, a 'cool down'-time until you actually can send troops or resources would be nice to avoid an alliance just change their confeds every 5 minutes. Or instant return of the reinforcem…

  • Over Modding.

    Schmitz' Katze - - Forum suggestions

    Post

    I hope this our wonderful professional video is not inappropriate... Travian Video Contest

  • Nah, that's useless. Those bot accounts don't send timed def or resources.

  • I didn't like it (chuckle) But for the same reasons as ELE I like the idea of limiting support (troops or res) to ally members and maybe confeds. Moreover, that would ruin the res- and troop-sellers immediately and decrease the numbers of their bot-accounts. Worth a try imo.

  • 15 minute edit rule

    Schmitz' Katze - - Forum suggestions

    Post

    It's not exactly on topic but probably the best place atm: Since the time-frame for editing posts has been restricted I cannot edit my posts at all, not even right after i have sent my post. It's not possible to send the edited version, browser doesn't load. This might be due to ... dunno? some ad-/pop-up blocker which I am using? I have disabled them all for the forum but still I am unable to edit. Messages to the CM haven't helped. That's quite annoying...

  • 2017 Awards Discussions

    Schmitz' Katze - - AWARDS 2017

    Post

    per domain? that's why TK is getting rid of his crwe? eliminate concurrence in advance? :O Hey, that's smart!

  • Banned players

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Just a question in between to make sure I don't accidentally violate any forum rules: My last post was edited for mentioning specific bans. I had named the reasons for which i had been banned in the past without mentioning any specific server or account. Does that mean it is generally forbidden by forum rules to mention the ban of a specific forum user and the reason s/he has been banned for? Thanks for reply

  • Banned players

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    Just to make that clear, tombo: I have never been banned for any forbidden tools simply because I neither use them nor does my alliance accept their usage.Doubtless, most of the bans are justified. And still every botter will claim their innocence. In case you got my posts like I was defending botters or denying there are lots of cheaters on the servers this might be due to my insufficient english. It's quite the opposite: I think there are way too many botters who are _not_ caught although one …

  • Banned players

    Schmitz' Katze - - General Discussions

    Post

    I know. This is why we suggested it to CM / complaints, not to the MH. Sorry for double-post, I seem to be unable to edit my posts even within the 20 minutes-frame. The question was whether TG is interested in finding mistakes in their detection system. Many previous posts have shown there _are_ issues within the system (which isn't surprising, nothing is ever 100% perfect). Indicators show the probable usage of forbidden tools and the MH / Admin decision is based on these indicators. (Which pro…