whats the plan for UK2?

    • TS2
    • New

      When will people realize it is just a game :/
      You attacked us, we attacked you back; you lost some troops, we lost some troops. Who did more damage to whom will depend on who wins the server. I personally think NemRis and GoT should work together instead of fighting each other; the leaders have decided otherwise and I am one to follow orders. I suggest NemRis to be more diplomatic than to be more aggressive. You know what we are capable off, and we know what you are capable off. If you want to win this server perhaps a little bit of diplomatic thinking should be done in your alliance. With that being said, good luck to both sides :) .

      Meme wrote:

      Please can we keep this polite, ladies and gentlemen.
      I like our moderator 8) .

      I am not gloating nor am I belittling you guys with the following reports - so don't think of me badly I am actually a nice guy :p . Just wanted to show the UK2 world that my leader "Amer" was not lying or exaggerating. And oh those are just from me, and frankly I really don't care about losing them anymore - they will be used to clear up oasis now :D .
      Good luck you guys :)

      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian

      P.S. BigBoss still love your counter <3
    • New

      BranStark wrote:

      I personally think NemRis and GoT should work together instead of fighting each other; the leaders have decided otherwise and I am one to follow orders. I suggest NemRis to be more diplomatic than to be more aggressive.

      BranStark you traitor, now i understand why they don;t defend you.

      you sugar talk them with your politeness , and they love you for that. And start hoping you will get them close to GoT and save them in the end. :cursing:
      Cp.black ... aux.
      Cp.jack......au5
    • New

      BranStark wrote:

      When will people realize it is just a game :/
      You attacked us, we attacked you back; you lost some troops, we lost some troops. Who did more damage to whom will depend on who wins the server. I personally think NemRis and GoT should work together instead of fighting each other; the leaders have decided otherwise and I am one to follow orders. I suggest NemRis to be more diplomatic than to be more aggressive. You know what we are capable off, and we know what you are capable off. If you want to win this server perhaps a little bit of diplomatic thinking should be done in your alliance. With that being said, good luck to both sides :) .

      Meme wrote:

      Please can we keep this polite, ladies and gentlemen.
      I like our moderator 8) .
      I am not gloating nor am I belittling you guys with the following reports - so don't think of me badly I am actually a nice guy :p . Just wanted to show the UK2 world that my leader "Amer" was not lying or exaggerating. And oh those are just from me, and frankly I really don't care about losing them anymore - they will be used to clear up oasis now :D .
      Good luck you guys :)

      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian
      Converter - Battle reports Travian

      P.S. BigBoss still love your counter <3
      Well said! It is at the end, just a game :) .
      Let's enjoy the round!I attack cuz it is part of this game, but in no way I dislike my neighbors. :thumbup:

      ps: I just got lucky :P
    • New

      The Godfather wrote:

      Oh dear so if someone attacks you the solution is to ally with them.
      Perhaps you did not understand what I meant to say. Just to help you understand lets take a situation of three players A, B and C.
      Say for example Player A has 400 troops, Player B has 600 troops, Player C has 1000 troops. A fights B and loses 200 troops X/ , while B loses 300 troops :cursing: , while C makes more troops :sleeping: .
      B decides to take out A X( but fails and A miraculously survives with 50 troops 8o while B is left with 0 ;( .
      The current situation: A has 50, B has 0 while C now probably has 1500 troops :evil: . Now the grand question, who wins in the end?
      Obvious answer: C wins, but A and B had the most fun. :thumbdown:

      Now consider if A and B decided to work together :thumbsup: , they get to have fun AND get the chance to win in the end.

      To answer your question, it purely depends on the current situation of the server. If Nemris was our only competition, then no, allying in that case would be stupid and boring. But alas, that is not the situation. There are alliances out there who has the potential to do more damage alone as to what two alliance can do combined - Player C in our example. In short, neither GoT nor NemRis has to gain anything from fighting with each other but to allow other alliances to take advantage of this situation. Keep in mind, all of this is my "personal" opinion. I do not even know what my leaders are planning, I just follow orders. In the end it all comes down to how diplomatic and strategic you are 8)
    • New

      BranStark wrote:

      The Godfather wrote:

      Oh dear so if someone attacks you the solution is to ally with them.
      Perhaps you did not understand what I meant to say. Just to help you understand lets take a situation of three players A, B and C.Say for example Player A has 400 troops, Player B has 600 troops, Player C has 1000 troops. A fights B and loses 200 troops X/ , while B loses 300 troops :cursing: , while C makes more troops :sleeping: .
      B decides to take out A X( but fails and A miraculously survives with 50 troops 8o while B is left with 0 ;( .
      The current situation: A has 50, B has 0 while C now probably has 1500 troops :evil: . Now the grand question, who wins in the end?
      Obvious answer: C wins, but A and B had the most fun. :thumbdown:

      Now consider if A and B decided to work together :thumbsup: , they get to have fun AND get the chance to win in the end.

      To answer your question, it purely depends on the current situation of the server. If Nemris was our only competition, then no, allying in that case would be stupid and boring. But alas, that is not the situation. There are alliances out there who has the potential to do more damage alone as to what two alliance can do combined - Player C in our example. In short, neither GoT nor NemRis has to gain anything from fighting with each other but to allow other alliances to take advantage of this situation. Keep in mind, all of this is my "personal" opinion. I do not even know what my leaders are planning, I just follow orders. In the end it all comes down to how diplomatic and strategic you are 8)




      I understand what you meant originally and the maths do add up. The problem is the server itself lacks depth this year. So just maybe we may have a few more WW's because individual teams may have a chance this ERA. Surely you win your quad then the ERA. Its been the same for 10 years. The choice is we have 4 teams one from each quad. So 4 metas. Anyway I think it all academic as I sure the leaders of the main alliances think they are good enough to win in their own right. It happened 3 years ago in UK2. Everyone got together to stop SWM. Fortunately it did not work for the mega meta because in the end of the day the team with the best organisation with the most troops and correct strategy should win.
    • New

      BranStark wrote:

      Now consider if A and B decided to work together , they get to have fun AND get the chance to win in the end.
      It depends on your definition of fun ....... I find fighting with the neighbours much more fun than fighting with the next quad 200 squares away ..... 15 hours for the troops to get there ... 15 hours to get back ..... if they come back ..... :sleeping: