But to get back to the idea of Skype meetings for alliance leaders. There are 30 or so domains. There is a CM for each one. To get each to provide the list of names (publicly announced on the forum - these can be just leader of such and such alliance) plus a time and a contact doesn’t take long, provided they know their community. If they don’t then that’s a pretty good indication of which are doing a good job or not isn’t it? If you don’t want to use Skype, there are plenty of cheap online meeting platforms like join.me. The agenda comes from a forum thread asking for questions. You schedule in an hour, post the agenda on the forum and the minutes at the end.
If you meant a sequence of such meeting in different zones language is still an issue, I have no idea if TG has anyone in their staff to run such meeting on Vietnamese or Turkish for example. In any case, TG did exactly that - they picked a sample of the group you are suggesting and invited that group for face to face meeting. It was not easy for everyone to participate in fast paced conversation even between even 15 people (language again), official part of the meeting lasted somewhat 20 hours, casual conversations in small groups were probably another 30 hours, yet we all left with questions we did not find time/good opportunity to ask.
I like the approach, I want to see TG building up on the event and improving the process. So what made you think that an on-line meeting of 120 (much more really) people will be more productive?