Day 25 - Ally analysis

    • TS5

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    Would you like to know what’s going on in the Tournament 2017 Finals?
    Keep yourself updated by reading "The Corner"!

    • Day 25 - Ally analysis

      TBA/TBC



      To Be announced? To Be confirmed?

      Not officially a confederation but as (according to the profile page) the alliance recruiter from one is in the other i think we can safely assume that it is the case.

      Server favourites to win in my humble opinion.

      Total Players across every wing. - 75 (3rd)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 75 (2nd)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 29 (1st)
      % of players who have settled. - 100.00 (1st)
      % of players who settled twice - 38.67 (1st)

      --

      BBT



      A straight rush to the 0|-100 WW.

      Controlling either South quadrant would probably be too much for them to achieve without heavy losses that would prevent them from winning. However, pinning yourself in between what will presumably become a quad dominant alliance on either side seems a large risk in itself.

      Would love to see them win though. Another Liecester city story.

      Total Players across every wing. - 41 (5th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 40 (5th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 1 (8th)
      % of players who have settled. - 97.56 (3rd)
      % of players who settled twice - 2.44 (9th)

      --

      NoName



      Set up a stronghold out in the sticks. Doing so has made supporting their own WW out of the question and a spoiler alliance would like to be further in.

      If i had to guess i would say their plan is to sim a couple hammers and offer to give support to the quad dominant WW, being TBA/TBC.

      Total Players across every wing. - 22 (9th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 18 (9th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 4 (4th)
      % of players who have settled. - 81.82 (7th)
      % of players who settled twice - 18.18 (3rd)

      --

      Sparta/AoW/LoW



      The first META showing it's face. I am sure there will be more.

      Spread across entire North there plan seems to be to sweep all beneath them like an army of white walkers (Game of thrones reference, if you don't know what that is then there is no hope for you). This though will not be easy with QoQ trying to take the NW and TBA/C trying to take the NE.

      I can see this META not making it to endgame. (sorry guys)

      Total Players across every wing. - 106 (1st)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 83 (1st)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 3 (6th)
      % of players who have settled. - 78.30 (10th)
      % of players who settled twice - 2.83 (8th)

      --

      TV



      These lot look like a nice little bunch of Scandinavians.

      Moving out immediatley and securing all the top croppers in the quad just outside of the 100|-100 marker. They won't be able to go it alone though so i expect to see them team up with RBS at some point. Whether that is before or after EFH depart is yet to be seen.

      Total Players across every wing. - 23 (8th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 23 (7th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 8 (3rd)
      % of players who have settled. - 100.00 (1st)
      % of players who settled twice - 34.78 (2nd)

      --

      QoQ/QoQ-D



      The only fully NW alliance out there but without enough players to compete with the other quad's big boys.

      Assuming i am correct about the collapse of the META it will massivley open up the recruitment pool for QoQ, hopefully for them that will be with plenty of time to prepare for artefacts.

      Failing that they will probably end up joining the META as that will be the only way to compete for end game.

      Total Players across every wing. - 35 (6th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 27 (6th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 1 (8th)
      % of players who have settled. - 77.14 (11th)
      % of players who settled twice - 2.86 (7th)

      --

      TE/{TE}



      The returning champs.

      Unless all of the little alliance in the quad form up againat them they will be in a great position to sim to artefacts and try to defend their title.

      Total Players across every wing. - 78 (2nd)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 59 (3rd)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 10 (2nd)
      % of players who have settled. - 80.77 (8th)
      % of players who settled twice - 12.82 (4th)

      --

      Fumetas



      I imagine these guys will team up with NWA, SW, TE or BBT.

      Total Players across every wing. - 15 (11th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 13 (11th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 0 (10th)
      % of players who have settled. - 86.67 (5th)
      % of players who settled twice - 0.00 (10th)

      --

      EFH



      Only here temporarily. The worst kind of alliance to have in your quad. At least a spoiler alliance will want to protect some hammers for end game but an alliance that has predetermined it will delete (and as such want to lose all of their hammers) before artefacts even come out, yikes. I would not want to be in the SW with this lot around.

      Total Players across every wing. - 26 (7th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 22 (8th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 2 (7th)
      % of players who have settled. - 84.62 (6th)
      % of players who settled twice - 7.69 (6th)

      --

      NWA



      I imagine these guys will team up with Fumetas, SW, TE or BBT.

      Total Players across every wing. - 19 (10th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 15 (10th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 0 (10th)
      % of players who have settled. - 78.95 (9th)
      % of players who settled twice - 0.00 (10th)

      --

      SW



      I imagine these guys will team up with Fumetas, NWA, TE or BBT.

      Total Players across every wing. - 12 (13th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 7 (13th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 0 (10th)
      % of players who have settled. - 58.33 (13th)
      % of players who settled twice - 0.00 (10th)

      --

      RBS



      The Royal Bank of Scotland. All have stayed very central and look well up for a fight. Part of me thinks these guys are going straight spoiler alliance but i have no official word on that.

      If they can make it through EFH's breif visit and remain in good shape then recruit TV to their cause then the SE will have a serious contender to bring to the table.

      I am sure they won't be able to win the server without TV and the battle with EFH will likely be hurt as they do not have to worry about preparing for the later stages of the server.

      Total Players across every wing. - 49 (4th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 47 (4th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 4 (4th)
      % of players who have settled. - 95.92 (4th)
      % of players who settled twice - 8.16 (5th)

      --

      B.B



      I think these guys are with BBT, nothing official though.

      If they aren't then they probably will be as they to have strongholded around the same WW.

      Total Players across every wing. - 14 (12th)
      AMT of players who have settled. - 10 (12th)
      AMT of players who settled twice - 0 (10th)
      % of players who have settled. - 71.43 (12th)
      % of players who settled twice - 0 (10th)

      --

      Disclaimer: Stats were more or less accurate at the time they were collected.
    • EFH:
      "The worst kind of alliance"
      "yikes"
      "SW"

      What is this blashphemy?

      Also did u know that every crunchie bar u eat increases ur chance of cancer by 1.1%, that means if u eat 90.9 crunchie bars in 1 day costing u £22.75 then ur chance of geting cancer is increased to 100%

      therefore.. for every 90.9 persons that reads this thread they will realize that TBA/TBC is the most boring robots on the server and that they should unite to prevent them from having victory, as they have had on the last 2 servers they played, they r pulsant or grapes.. shud be noted ;)

      just like u shudnt eat 90.9 crunchie bars, if 90.9 of us decide to make it our objective to prevent TBA/TBC from winning then we wil have a 100% chance of victory!

      btw u can find the tba/tbc bosses at ; **267‬‬|**186‬‬
      aka elisa
      No-cringe signature.
    • Trouble wrote:



      therefore.. for every 90.9 persons that reads this thread they will realize that TBA/TBC is the most boring robots on the server and that they should unite to prevent them from having victory, as they have had on the last 2 servers they played, they r pulsant or grapes.. shud be noted ;)


      We prefer go by Grapes than Pulsant
    • yeah

      they should know i wrote a reply before that made the browser crash

      i was like damn i gona have to remember it

      the calculations for the crunchie bar comes with links before

      also u hadnt replied yet and i dont read signatures anyway amalogs has ruined it for me, no one wants to see 1.3 million mace man its an abomination

      also crunch all my recent servers since the last tourney im 1 for 1 every time even if I do delete early 1 guy is going with me every time

      my ign is eli monpress
      No-cringe signature.
    • Depends how you look at it.

      In reality:
      An extremely powerful siege device that launches projectiles in an arced fire path. They are highly immobile though so most armies would construct them from the timber surrounding the target once the arrived. They are notoriously inaccurate and cause imense amounts of collateral damage to the buildings surrounding the target. Due to the range only a couple is needed to cripple an entire city.

      In travian:
      An extremely precise missile system than also engages in hand to hand combat with defending troops even without having hands. It moves less than half a fast as a Roman defensive troop who is eager to save the lives of his family and countrymen and more that 10 thousand are needed to take down a singular building.